๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐?
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐?
Here is the answer & explanation of this question:
First, we have an object named “income” with three properties:
1. “๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ”, which is set to 108.
2. “๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ”, which is a method that calculates the monthly income based on the “๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ” value.
3. “๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ”, which is an arrow function meant to calculate the yearly income.
๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ “๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ()” ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐:
1. “๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ()” is a regular function. When you call “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐.๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ()”, this refers to the “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐” object.
2. “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ.๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ” inside the “๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ()” method correctly refers to “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐.๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ”, which is 108.
3. So, “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ.๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ * ๐๐๐” becomes “๐๐๐ * ๐๐๐”, which equals 11664.
4. Therefore, “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐.๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ()” returns 11664.
๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ “๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ” ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง:
1. “๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ” is defined as an arrow function.
2. Arrow functions do not have their own “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ” context; they inherit “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ” from the surrounding (lexical) context at the time they are defined.
3. In this case, “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ” in “yearly” refers to the global object (“๐ฐ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฐ” in browsers, “๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ” in Node.js), not the “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐” object.
4. Since there is no “๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ” property on the global object, “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ.๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ” is “๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐”.
5. As a result, “๐๐๐ * ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ.๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ” becomes “๐๐๐ * ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐”, which is “๐๐๐” (Not a Number).
6. Therefore, “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐.๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ()” returns “๐๐๐”.
๐๐จ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ณ๐:
1. “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐.๐ฆ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐ฅ๐ฒ()” works as expected and returns 11664 because “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ” correctly refers to the “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐” object.
2. “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐.๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ()” returns “๐๐๐” because “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ” inside the arrow function does not refer to the “๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐” object, leading to “๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ.๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ” being “๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐”.
๐
๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ.